Closed sarvagyaa closed 4 months ago
Thank you very much for the review, Alex, and apologies for the typos. Please update the ontology in the wiki based on your discussion about the "measurement control" class. I'll make the corresponding changes, fix the positioning of the spatial and temporal reference_system classes, and correct the typos in the OWL file, and submit it for the next review.
I noticed that Christiaan made some class name changes in the wiki-ontology based on your discussion in the last meeting. I'll include these changes as well, in the OWL file.
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 3:55 AM AlexIvanHoward @.***> wrote:
@.**** requested changes on this pull request.
Thanks a lot for your work, Abhi! Much appreciated. I've left a few comments and requests here and there. Will add the possible addition of a "measurement control" class to the agenda of our next group discussion - thanks for the nudge!
In Schemas/OWL/Ontology-ImpactAccounting.owl https://github.com/aartum/CA2-SIG-StandardsWG/pull/75#discussion_r1501883192 :
Rather let 'temporal_reference_system' be a direct subclass of 'control'.
In Schemas/OWL/Ontology-ImpactAccounting.owl https://github.com/aartum/CA2-SIG-StandardsWG/pull/75#discussion_r1501883626 :
Rather let 'spatial_reference_system' be a direct subclass of 'control'.
In Schemas/OWL/Ontology-ImpactAccounting.owl https://github.com/aartum/CA2-SIG-StandardsWG/pull/75#discussion_r1501884280 :
<Declaration>
- + +
Let's stick to 'control' for now. It is an interesting discussion point, though. I'll add it to the agenda for our next group meeting to discuss the possible definition of a "measurement control".
In Schemas/OWL/Ontology-ImpactAccounting.owl https://github.com/aartum/CA2-SIG-StandardsWG/pull/75#discussion_r1501884491 :
Let's remove all references to 'measurement_statement' for now and just stick to 'control' until we've discussed with the larger group whether we should define a class like this :)
In Schemas/OWL/Ontology-ImpactAccounting.owl https://github.com/aartum/CA2-SIG-StandardsWG/pull/75#discussion_r1501884665 :
<Declaration>
- + +
[typo] measurement_instrument
In Schemas/OWL/Ontology-ImpactAccounting.owl https://github.com/aartum/CA2-SIG-StandardsWG/pull/75#discussion_r1501884710 :
</Declaration>
- + [typo] spatial_parameter
In Schemas/OWL/Ontology-ImpactAccounting.owl https://github.com/aartum/CA2-SIG-StandardsWG/pull/75#discussion_r1501884757 :
</Declaration>
[typo] temporal_reference_system
In Schemas/OWL/Ontology-ImpactAccounting.owl https://github.com/aartum/CA2-SIG-StandardsWG/pull/75#discussion_r1501884828 :
</SubClassOf>
- - + + +
[typo] spatial_parameter
In Schemas/OWL/Ontology-ImpactAccounting.owl https://github.com/aartum/CA2-SIG-StandardsWG/pull/75#discussion_r1501884862 :
[for consistency] claim_(n)
In Schemas/OWL/Ontology-ImpactAccounting.owl https://github.com/aartum/CA2-SIG-StandardsWG/pull/75#discussion_r1501884884 :
[for consistency] claim_(n)
In Schemas/OWL/Ontology-ImpactAccounting.owl https://github.com/aartum/CA2-SIG-StandardsWG/pull/75#discussion_r1501884949 :
[typo] spatial_parameter
In Schemas/OWL/Ontology-ImpactAccounting.owl https://github.com/aartum/CA2-SIG-StandardsWG/pull/75#discussion_r1501884995 :
[typo] measurement_instrument
In Schemas/OWL/Ontology-ImpactAccounting.owl https://github.com/aartum/CA2-SIG-StandardsWG/pull/75#discussion_r1501885023 :
[typo] temporal_reference_system
In Schemas/OWL/Ontology-ImpactAccounting.owl https://github.com/aartum/CA2-SIG-StandardsWG/pull/75#discussion_r1501885079 :
[for consistency] claim_(n)
In Schemas/OWL/Ontology-ImpactAccounting.owl https://github.com/aartum/CA2-SIG-StandardsWG/pull/75#discussion_r1501885150 :
[for consistency] claim_(n)
In Schemas/OWL/Ontology-ImpactAccounting.owl https://github.com/aartum/CA2-SIG-StandardsWG/pull/75#discussion_r1501885195 :
[for consistency] claim_(n)
In Schemas/OWL/Ontology-ImpactAccounting.owl https://github.com/aartum/CA2-SIG-StandardsWG/pull/75#discussion_r1501885223 :
[typo] temporal_reference_system
In Schemas/OWL/Ontology-ImpactAccounting.owl https://github.com/aartum/CA2-SIG-StandardsWG/pull/75#discussion_r1501885284 :
@@ -268,7 +516,7 @@
- + [typo] measurement_instrument
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/aartum/CA2-SIG-StandardsWG/pull/75#pullrequestreview-1899737470, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABA4UFWIGSJOVKJ5Y2MPMU3YVOJMZAVCNFSM6AAAAABDLQ3L26VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43YUDVNRWFEZLROVSXG5CSMV3GSZLXHMYTQOJZG4ZTONBXGA . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
Hi, Alex. Thank you for the updates. I'll get cracking on the changes.
Hello Abhi
Just look at the spelling of #measurement_statemenr
Should it rather be #measurement_statement ?
Regards, Christiaan
On 26 Apr 2024, at 10:46, Abhi Sarvagyam @.***> wrote:
statemenr
Christiaan Pauw Tel: 044 6950 749 Cell: 082 557 4328 www.nova.org.za www.aartum.io
Hi, Christiaan. Alex already pointed that out and I fixed it, but haven't committed the corrected file yet. I guess you'd have seen the older file when you replied (10 mins ago, as per GitHub).
Thanks
On 26 Apr 2024, at 11:09, Abhi Sarvagyam @.***> wrote:
Hi, Christiaan. Alex already pointed that out and I fixed it, but haven't committed the corrected file yet. I guess you'd have seen the older file when you replied (10 mins ago, as per GitHub).
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/aartum/CA2-SIG-StandardsWG/pull/75#issuecomment-2078968900, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJW6HUNVGYHHDGANW3YFV3Y7IKUZAVCNFSM6AAAAABDLQ3L26VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDANZYHE3DQOJQGA. You are receiving this because you commented.
Christiaan Pauw Tel: 044 6950 749 Cell: 082 557 4328 www.nova.org.za www.aartum.io
Updated Ontology-ImpactAccounting.owl: Added the classes that were in the Wiki page as on Feb 7th 2024