Open Fusica opened 5 days ago
I tried using the command python main.py --epochs 50 --batch_size 24 --output_dir outputs/202410231444 --resume weights/poet_lmo_maskrcnn.pth --eval to test the pth file you provided, and I got the following results. Does this match your results, and does this result prove that there is no problem with my dataset?
The angle error feels large, with 40°.
I encountered several issues when trying to train on the lom dataset and reproduce the author's results:
First, I found that in lmo2poet.py, the division method for the lmo dataset is quite different from what I downloaded from bop. The lmo downloaded from bop does not have the train_pbr and train_synt subfolders. I would like to ask which version of lmo the author used.
Then, when I loaded lmo_maskrcnn_checkpoint.pth.tar during training, the ADD was all 0. I want to know if it's because I made a mistake in the dataset generation step, or if there is something wrong with my training hyperparameters. I have referred to some of the hyperparameter settings provided in the author's link, but the results have not improved at all.
I sincerely hope the author can point out where my problem lies, as I am very eager to follow your work.