Closed lzcun closed 2 years ago
Hi, can you provide related input and output files?
OK, it has INPUT, STRU, and runing_scf.log about before and after relaxation. In doc 'relax' are the INPUT and output files.
The width of Gaussian smearing is 0.2 Ry in the structural relaxation, while that is 0.02 Ry in the SCF, which causes the opposite results.
In the structural relaxation, the initial energy is -12644.7096725 eV, and the final energy is -12649.07110999118 eV. In the SCF, the initial energy is -12634.6964808355114656 eV, and the final energy is -12630.7770245020055881 eV.
And I notice that the max force of the relaxed STRU is > 0.01 eV/A if smearing_sigma
= 0.02 Ry, showing that the parameters between relax and scf must be consistent to obtain the correct result.
Thanks for your reply! Sorry, I did not notice that before. Now the results are right when the parameters become consistent.
I recently did 100 fs AIMD at 400K and optimized the geometry. I found the ground-state energy decreases after structural relaxation. The following is the FINAL_ETOT obtained calculating the SCF before and after the relaxation: The SCF before relaxing:
The SCF after relaxing:
I wonder whether it is a bug of ABACUS. And the basis_type all I used is 'lcao'.