Add license

[antangelo]

There is currently no license file or information (that I could find) in the tester's source tree, would be nice to have some clarity on how the project is licensed

[abaire]

The initial code was based on a branch in the nxdk from @ernegien pre-license cleanup, so it's unclear what license would be applicable (the README for https://github.com/Ernegien/nxdk/tree/test/texture-formats would apply).

I generally use CC0 1.0 Universal for my work, but following BSD or MIT to align with the nxdk at the time that I forked the texture-formats test seems most reasonable to me. Ideally we can just use MIT to stay aligned with the current licensing (https://github.com/XboxDev/nxdk/tree/master/LICENSES).

Assuming @ernegien can clarify the license for the original code and that it would likely be one @abairmj - would you be OK with MIT licensing for your contributions?

@antangelo - would you be OK with MIT licensing for your contributions?

@NZJenkins - would you be OK with MIT licensing for your contributions?

@mborgerson - would you be OK with MIT licensing for your contributions?

@Metalsasi - would you be OK with MIT licensing for your contributions?

[Ernegien]

Good to see you abaire :) I typically go with MIT but anything I produce that's Xbox-related I'm also fine re-licensing to whatever.

[abairmj]

Good to hear from you bro! I'm fine with MIT or any other license.

On Sat, Feb 25, 2023, 10:21 AM Erik Abair @.***> wrote:

The initial code was based on a branch in the nxdk from @Ernegien https://github.com/Ernegien pre-license cleanup, so it's unclear what license would be applicable (the README for https://github.com/Ernegien/nxdk/tree/test/texture-formats would apply).

I generally use CC0 1.0 Universal for my work, but following BSD or MIT to align with the nxdk at the time that I forked the texture-formats test seems most reasonable to me. Ideally we can just use MIT to stay aligned with the current licensing ( https://github.com/XboxDev/nxdk/tree/master/LICENSES).

Assuming @Ernegien https://github.com/Ernegien can clarify the license for the original code and that it would likely be one @abairmj https://github.com/abairmj - would you be OK with MIT licensing for your contributions?

@antangelo https://github.com/antangelo - would you be OK with MIT licensing for your contributions?

@NZJenkins https://github.com/NZJenkins - would you be OK with MIT licensing for your contributions?

@mborgerson https://github.com/mborgerson - would you be OK with MIT licensing for your contributions?

@Metalsasi https://github.com/Metalsasi - would you be OK with MIT licensing for your contributions?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/abaire/nxdk_pgraph_tests/issues/92#issuecomment-1445141152, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AE45WFTCBL7IS6HD4PKJJHLWZIPQZANCNFSM6AAAAAAUG5EYHM . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

[mborgerson]

MIT is fine with me, thanks

[antangelo]

I'm good with MIT for my contributions

[Metalsasi]

Hi, I am also fine with MIT license.