Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
One possible way of addressing some of Jakob's concerns would be to add some
language
to the Catalog Relations section indicating that Atom allows you to use URIs as
rel
values, and to reuse rdf vocabularies such as frbr, sioc, etc.
Original comment by ed.summers
on 27 May 2010 at 6:23
I don't want to reproduce too much text from the Atom spec but we could
certainly point
to the right place.
Original comment by hadrien....@gmail.com
on 27 May 2010 at 7:32
URIs as rel values should be allowed but the spec should provide some guidance
on
useful relations. As far as I see there is no easy way to differentiate
"Acquisition
Relations" and "Relations between resources, so the spec should contain a set
of
Acquisition Relations that covers most use cases (see ISSUE #38).
Original comment by siehea...@googlemail.com
on 27 May 2010 at 8:31
It is very easy to differentiate acquisition relations and relations between
resources since acquisition relations are strictly limited to rel values that
start with opds:acquisition.
Original comment by hadrien....@gmail.com
on 15 Jun 2010 at 2:59
Original comment by abdela...@gmail.com
on 4 Aug 2010 at 3:23
We've turned this post into several action items and feel that we don't need to
have this generic issue open anymore.
Original comment by hadrien....@gmail.com
on 4 Aug 2010 at 4:10
Original comment by abdela...@gmail.com
on 4 Aug 2010 at 4:36
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
abdela...@gmail.com
on 26 May 2010 at 11:34