Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
In the current spec, sample means an extract that is freely available for
download.
I don't think that we want to go down that road and define multiple acquisition
techniques for samples.
In this case, you should rather use a separate entry for the sample, use the
already
defined rel values (buy, borrow, subscribe) and use a link with the right rel
value
to explicit the relationship between the full publication and its elements.
Revues.org for example already provide a link to a feed with all the articles
listed
in a journal.
Original comment by hadrien....@gmail.com
on 27 May 2010 at 8:30
I'd like to reject this issue, can anyone else provide their feedback first ?
Original comment by hadrien....@gmail.com
on 15 Jul 2010 at 4:29
Original comment by abdela...@gmail.com
on 4 Aug 2010 at 3:23
We don't feel that this has been justified by real-world implementations at
this time. We'll be watching for implementations of this in the future.
Original comment by abdela...@gmail.com
on 4 Aug 2010 at 3:39
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
siehea...@googlemail.com
on 27 May 2010 at 7:59