Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Original comment by abdela...@gmail.com
on 16 Aug 2010 at 7:08
New text; feedback welcome.
http://code.google.com/p/openpub/wiki/CatalogSpecDraft#OPDS_Catalog_Relations
"""
Sorting Relations¶
This specification defines two new relations, which begin with
"http://opds-spec.org/sort", to describe how an Acquisition Feed is sorted.
These relations SHOULD be used when creating Navigation Feeds and the OPDS
Catalog Root, if applicable.
"http://opds-spec.org/sort/new": An Acquisition Feed with newly released OPDS
Catalog Entries. These Acquisition Feeds typically contain a subset of the OPDS
Catalog Entries in an OPDS Catalog based on the publication date of the
Publication.
"http://opds-spec.org/sort/popular": An Acquisition Feed with popular OPDS
Catalog Entries. These Acquisition Feeds typically contain a subset of the OPDS
Catalog Entries in an OPDS Catalog based on a numerical ranking criteria.
Acquisition Feeds using the "http://opds-spec.org/sort/new" relation SHOULD be
ordered with the most recent items first. Acquisition Feeds using the
"http://opds-spec.org/sort/popular" relation SHOULD be ordered with the most
popular items first.
Popular Relation
This specification also defines a relation to describe an Acquisition Feed of
featured items. This relation SHOULD be used when creating Navigation Feeds and
the OPDS Catalog Root, if applicable.
"http://opds-spec.org/featured": An Acquisition Feed with featured OPDS Catalog
Entries. These Acquisition Feeds typically contain a subset of the OPDS Catalog
Entries in an OPDS Catalog that have been selected for promotion by the OPDS
Catalog provider. No order is implied.
"""
I also added something to address Roger's point from the call:
"""When creating an OPDS Catalog with Navigation and Acquisition Feeds, OPDS
Catalog providers are encouraged to use the relations defined in this
specification and [DRAFT-Web-Linking]. If no appropriate relation is found, the
Feeds SHOULD use a descriptive "atom:title" element and the "atom:link"s SHOULD
use a descriptive "title" attribute."""
Original comment by abdela...@gmail.com
on 18 Aug 2010 at 5:51
Looks great.
Original comment by kevin.s.hawkins
on 18 Aug 2010 at 6:41
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
kevin.s.hawkins
on 12 Aug 2010 at 8:55