Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Please develop a section of specification text that clarifies which schema is
used to
express metadata defined by both Dublin Core and Atom (title, author/creator,
etc).
Original comment by abdela...@gmail.com
on 10 Mar 2010 at 3:40
Raj: Please contribute a rough draft of this section before the 8am Pacific
call tomorrow, 5 May 2010.
Original comment by abdela...@gmail.com
on 4 May 2010 at 6:14
The standardized way for including metadata in OPDS feeds is now described in
the "Partial and Complete
Catalog Entries" section of the draft.
Link to relevant section:
http://code.google.com/p/openpub/wiki/CatalogSpecDraft#Element_Definitions
Original comment by rku...@archive.org
on 10 May 2010 at 5:10
I still think we need more text clarifying when to use things from DC versus
Atom when there are conflicts (title,
for example).
Original comment by abdela...@gmail.com
on 12 May 2010 at 5:54
Hadrien: I'm feeling pretty ill this weekend, so would you please work with
Gavin to clarify this issue and draft
some rough text to describe which vocabulary should be used to markup which
elements. I realized how
important this was after working through some very reasonable questions Gavin
had while trying to update the
O'Reilly Catalogs.
This is due 18 May 2010. Please let me know if that's not possible given your
schedule.
Sample:
"""
For the date when the OPDS Catalog Entry was changed, use atom:updated, not
dc:issued. Instead, use
dc:issued for the publication date of the Publication itself (not atom:updated).
For the Publication's title, use atom:title (not dc:title).
"""
Original comment by abdela...@gmail.com
on 16 May 2010 at 9:14
Original comment by abdela...@gmail.com
on 18 May 2010 at 6:04
Sorry, I was in Lille for a conference where I talked about OPDS yesterday...
How can I reach Gavin to start working on this section ?
Original comment by hadrien....@gmail.com
on 18 May 2010 at 10:09
http://code.google.com/p/openpub/wiki/CatalogSpecDraft#Relationship_between_Atom
_and_
Dublin-Core_metadata
OPDS entries MUST be identified by atom:id. dc:identifier SHOULD be used to
identify
the publication itself, not the OPDS entry.
OPDS entries MUST provide a date where the entry was last updated using
atom:updated.
dc:issued SHOULD be used for the first publication date of the publication, not
for
any date related to the OPDS entry itself.
For the publication's title, Catalog providers MUST use atom:title. Catalog
providers
MUST NOT display this information in dc:title.
A partial publication description SHOULD be displayed atom:summary, while a
full
description SHOULD be displayed in atom:content. Catalog providers MUST NOT
display
this information in dc:description.
For the publication's authors, Catalog providers SHOULD use atom:author.
Catalog
providers MUST NOT display this information in dc:creator.
For the publication's categories, Catalog providers SHOULD use atom:category.
Catalog
providers MUST NOT display this information in dc:subject.
For the publication's rights, Catalog providers SHOULD use atom:rights. Catalog
providers MUST NOT display this information in dc:rights.
Original comment by hadrien....@gmail.com
on 19 May 2010 at 1:47
This all seems very sensible to me.
Original comment by liza31337@gmail.com
on 19 May 2010 at 1:52
I don't feel that we have enough knowledge of prism: to actually be able to
assert which elements SHOULD or
SHOULD NOT be included.
Example: prism:issue doesn't even exist the in version of the spec I'm looking
at.
Original comment by abdela...@gmail.com
on 21 May 2010 at 5:44
Original comment by abdela...@gmail.com
on 25 May 2010 at 5:44
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
abdela...@gmail.com
on 16 Jul 2009 at 7:11