Closed HRHLALALA closed 4 years ago
Hi, Thanks for asking! Please do check this https://github.com/abduallahmohamed/Social-STGCNN/issues/14#issuecomment-605328659 and let me know if your question still unanswered after this.
Thanks for providing this comment. Maybe it is dumb to ask. Would you please give a deeper explanation of "distribution" and "expectation" you mentioned?
Thanks for asking again. Our model predicts a bi-variate Gaussian distribution per each time step per pedestrian. Then later on we sample these distributions to generate the trajectories. these distributions become uncorrelated in the sampling unlike Social-GAN where it generates a sample of trajectories( expectation) and do this 20 times. Let me know if this still unclear On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 3:26 AM HRHLALALA notifications@github.com wrote:
Thanks for providing this comment. Maybe it is dumb to ask. Would you please give a deeper explanation of "distribution" and "expectation" you mentioned?
— You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/abduallahmohamed/Social-STGCNN/issues/27#issuecomment-650717073, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFIVLG7FMW4EICVHR75BH73RY35B5ANCNFSM4OKLW27A .
--
Abduallah Mohamed abduallahmohamed.com
Thanks. It is clear now
Hi, thanks for your good work. I have a question regarding the evaluation. I notice that you follow the steps like:
However, the evaluation in social gan follows the way like:
Do you think that these two different processes make the evaluation unfair? Please correct me if I misunderstand these two steps. I hope I can get your answer soon.