Closed afternoon2 closed 5 months ago
As a user, I'd still opt for a rename possibility (inspect sounds less alarming, but still in a "checking if everything's fine" manner rather than presenting program's valid features). And if not via the runner's method, then maybe with ctx.inspect_label(label: &str)
?
As a user, I'd still opt for a rename possibility (inspect sounds less alarming, but still in a "checking if everything's fine" manner rather than presenting program's valid features). And if not via the runner's method, then maybe with
ctx.inspect_label(label: &str)
?
This really feels like API clutter, regardless of where it lives. What's the use case here? What problem would that solve?
just a customization option, but I won't fight for it
ah, forgot to add a label for the PR, sorry 🙏🏻
ah, forgot to add a label for the PR, sorry 🙏🏻
No prob, I'm not even sure they are settable by external contributors 🤷🏻
Sorry for the humongous delay! 🙏🏻
ctx.inspect()
✅