Today, all submit commands push to $remote/$name where $name is the same as the local branch name—except if the branch was renamed after the initial push.
This is fine as the default, but it doesn't handle the case where $name is already taken by the remote.
This will especially be true if the local name happens to be something generic.
We can probably inspect local tracking branches, and use a different name (e.g. $name-$n for an incrementing value of $n) if that's the case.
Today, all submit commands push to
$remote/$namewhere$nameis the same as the local branch name—except if the branch was renamed after the initial push.This is fine as the default, but it doesn't handle the case where
$nameis already taken by the remote. This will especially be true if the local name happens to be something generic. We can probably inspect local tracking branches, and use a different name (e.g.$name-$nfor an incrementing value of$n) if that's the case.