Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Original comment by lar...@gmail.com
on 4 Nov 2011 at 10:15
Made an attempt in revision 533fe8427a, but it turns out that using 2-10
threads has pretty exactly the same performance as 1. Not sure why this is so,
but it might mean that having more Lucene searchers is not a good idea.
Need to rework the patch so that there's only one Lucene searcher active, and
instead just run the string matching in parallel.
Also uncertain how fast the queueing and unqueueing is. It might be possible to
gain something there. Maybe.
Original comment by lar...@gmail.com
on 6 Nov 2011 at 3:27
This was added a long time ago, should have closed the issue then.
Original comment by lar...@gmail.com
on 30 May 2013 at 10:47
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
lar...@gmail.com
on 4 Sep 2011 at 1:22