Open liusihang opened 8 months ago
Hello
How have you estimated the expected number?
Hello
How have you estimated the expected number?
Hello, I initially utilized MEGAHIT for the assembly of genomic data, yielded a contig FASTA file approximately 1.2GB in size after removing contigs < 1000bp.
Description of bug
Hello, I recently ran metaviralSPAdes on a set of general environmental samples without targeted viral enrichment, and I noticed that the number of contigs generated is significantly lower than expected. I'm reaching out to seek insights or suggestions on why this might be the case and how to potentially improve the outcome.
spades.log
spades.log
params.txt
params.txt
SPAdes version
SPAdes version: 3.15.5
Operating System
Ubuntu 20.02
Python Version
Python version: 3.12.2
Method of SPAdes installation
conda
No errors reported in spades.log
contigs.zip
Update
The metaspades mode was employed to test the same data, utilizing the --only-assembler option. A significantly larger contig fasta file was generated. params.txt spades.log