Closed priv-kweihmann closed 3 years ago
@pombredanne I'm actually a little torn about this - on the one hand the usage of commonly known variable is what I would like to see, on the other I'm not sure about any possible sideeffects, as esp. LD_LIBRARY_PATH
is pretty invasive.
So I guess it's better to follow your proposal, even if it mean having a larger env set to mind when building - will push a v2 somewhat soon
BTW does that somehow need to be documented here? If yes, please point me to the right doc to edit
@priv-kweihmann you wrote:
BTW does that somehow need to be documented here? If yes, please point me to the right doc to edit
We can start with a simple doc statement in the README of each plugin.
And beyond this we may want to put this in:
the main scancode-toolkit documentation @AyanSinhaMahapatra which place would be best in https://github.com/nexB/scancode-toolkit/tree/develop/docs/source ?
https://github.com/nexB/typecode README (it does not have a proper doc yet otherwise)
https://github.com/nexB/extractcode README (it does not have a proper doc yet otherwise)
New version pushed, including some brief documentation in the respective plugin dir - let me know if there is more to do from my side
@pombredanne I think there should be a list at https://github.com/nexB/scancode-toolkit/tree/develop/docs/source/plugins with all available ones, that would make sense. If that was what you're asking, should that get a separate issue?
@priv-kweihmann Thank you ++ let me merge all this as well as this other PR https://github.com/nexB/extractcode/pull/18 by @tardyp which is closely related. I will refactor the code to get this cascaded behaviour as a generally available and documented way to get pre-built binaries across all the tools and libraries:
by optionally using environment variables