Open pombredanne opened 5 years ago
#################################################################
#################################################################
####### #######
####### Open Icon Library #######
####### Relevant Parts of Original License File #######
####### #######
#################################################################
#################################################################
##################################################################
## Licenses:
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-SA 3.0)
link: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
GNU Lesser General Public License 2.1 (LGPL)
link: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/LGPL/2.1/
Public Domain (PD)
link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_domain
###################################################
## File List:
##
File Name / Source / License
office-chart-line-stacked.png / oxygen / CC-BY-SA 3.0 or LGPL
zoom-in-5.png / oxygen / CC-BY-SA 3.0 or LGPL
view-right-close.png / oxygen / CC-BY-SA 3.0 or LGPL
view-right-new-3.png / oxygen / CC-BY-SA 3.0 or LGPL
window-new-6.png / oxygen / CC-BY-SA 3.0 or LGPL
draw-eraser-2.png / oxygen / CC-BY-SA 3.0 or LGPL
document-save-5.png / oxygen / CC-BY-SA 3.0 or LGPL
anonymous_simple_weather_symbols_1.png / open_clip_art_library / PD
Note: some fields are omitted in json license scan dump
License Scan: File 1
"license_expressions": [
"gpl-1.0-plus",
"gpl-1.0-plus",
"mit",
"bsd-new",
"public-domain",
"public-domain",
"public-domain",
"public-domain",
"gpl-1.0-plus",
"gpl-1.0-plus",
"lgpl-2.0-plus",
"public-domain",
"gpl-1.0-plus",
"gpl-1.0-plus",
"lgpl-2.0-plus",
"public-domain",
"gpl-1.0-plus",
"public-domain",
"public-domain",
"public-domain",
"public-domain",
"cc-by-1.0",
"cc-by-1.0",
"cc-by-2.0",
"cc-by-2.0",
"cc-by-2.5",
"cc-by-2.5",
"cc-by-3.0",
"cc-by-3.0",
"cc-by-sa-1.0",
"cc-by-sa-1.0",
"cc-by-sa-2.0",
"cc-by-sa-2.0",
"cc-by-sa-2.5",
"cc-by-sa-2.5",
"cc-by-sa-3.0",
"cc-by-sa-3.0",
"gpl-1.0-plus",
"gpl-2.0",
"gpl-2.0",
"gpl-1.0-plus",
"gpl-3.0",
"gpl-3.0",
"lgpl-2.0-plus",
"lgpl-2.1",
"lgpl-2.1-plus",
"lgpl-3.0",
"mit",
"mit AND bsd-new",
"bsd-new",
"public-domain",
"public-domain",
"public-domain",
"public-domain",
"cc-by-3.0",
"cc-by-3.0",
"lgpl-2.1",
"lgpl-2.1",
"lgpl-2.1",
"lgpl-2.1",
"public-domain",
"public-domain",
"cc-by-sa-3.0",
"cc-by-sa-3.0",
"public-domain",
"public-domain",
"cc-by-2.5",
"cc-by-3.0",
"cc-by-3.0",
"cc-by-2.5",
"cc-by-sa-2.5",
"gpl-2.0",
"gpl-2.0",
"gpl-2.0",
"gpl-2.0",
"gpl-2.0",
"gpl-2.0",
"public-domain",
"public-domain",
"public-domain",
"public-domain",
"gpl-2.0",
"gpl-2.0",
"gpl-2.0",
"gpl-2.0",
"lgpl-2.1",
"lgpl-2.1",
"lgpl-2.1",
"lgpl-2.1",
"cc-by-sa-2.5",
"public-domain",
"public-domain",
"public-domain",
"public-domain",
"public-domain",
"public-domain",
"gpl-3.0",
"gpl-3.0",
"public-domain",
"public-domain",
"cc-by-sa-3.0",
"lgpl-2.0-plus",
"cc-by-sa-3.0",
"lgpl-2.1",
"gpl-2.0",
"gpl-2.0",
"public-domain",
"public-domain",
"cc-by-3.0",
"cc-by-3.0",
"gpl-1.0-plus",
"gpl-2.0",
"gpl-1.0-plus",
"mit AND bsd-new",
"gpl-1.0-plus",
"gpl-1.0-plus",
"public-domain",
"public-domain",
"gpl-2.0",
"gpl-2.0",
"public-domain",
"public-domain"
]
License Scan: File 2
"license_expressions": [
"cc-by-sa-3.0",
"cc-by-sa-3.0",
"lgpl-2.1-plus",
"lgpl-2.0-plus",
"lgpl-2.1",
"public-domain",
"public-domain",
"cc-by-sa-3.0",
"lgpl-2.0-plus",
"cc-by-sa-3.0",
"lgpl-2.0-plus",
"cc-by-sa-3.0",
"lgpl-2.0-plus",
"cc-by-sa-3.0",
"lgpl-2.0-plus",
"cc-by-sa-3.0",
"lgpl-2.0-plus",
"cc-by-sa-3.0",
"lgpl-2.0-plus",
"cc-by-sa-3.0",
"lgpl-2.0-plus"
]
I am attaching the htmls for both files. I have verified both the files manually also. LicenseDetection_Verified.zip
@mriiinal
We always list everything, never remove dupes by design.
Typically yes. You may want to use the --license-text
to get extra details
@hamzam1997 thanks. Using --json-pp - --license-text
is IMHO required with a creful review of the license text and detected license texts to make sure
@pombredanne I will definitely work again using --json-pp - --license-text
@pombredanne I have sent a PR request for it. Please review for any changes needed
@hamzam1997 the way to get this done is explained in a few places. In particular here https://github.com/nexB/scancode-toolkit/issues/296#issuecomment-284451265
Hey!! @pombredanne may i know how much is the work done regarding the issue, so i can work on this issue?
See https://openmodelica.org/svn/OpenModelica/branches/requirements/PythonInterface/PySimulator/Icons/open_icon_library-standard_LICENSES.txt