Closed AyanSinhaMahapatra closed 1 year ago
IMHO the ordering is not stable. I would wrap these two in a sort()
for package in packages:
would become:
for package in sorted(packages):
for _name, packages in packages_by_package_name.items():
for package in packages:
would become:
for _name, packages in sorted(packages_by_package_name.items()):
for package in sorted(packages):
@pombredanne that worked fine, even though there's rearrangement on this commit, I've tested that following additions wouldn't have this many rearrangements.