strb encoding individual lane validity/activity should be contingent on C≥7. As otherwise, C=7 is identical in functionality to C=6.
Instead, the intent was most likely to have C≥7 add support for individual lane validity (a strb bit per element lane), while C≥8 adds support for individual lane-based sequence terminations (a last signal per element lane).
Issue
https://abs-tudelft.github.io/tydi/specification/physical.html#signals
Mentions that
strb
encoding individual lane validity is contingent on C≥8. This is repeated in a few other places.However, https://abs-tudelft.github.io/tydi/specification/physical.html#signal-omission makes
strb
contingent on C≥7. And https://abs-tudelft.github.io/tydi/specification/physical.html#complexity-c likewise suggests that "The indices of the active data lanes can be described with a simple range." only applies to C<7.Assumed/Suggested Fix
strb
encoding individual lane validity/activity should be contingent on C≥7. As otherwise, C=7 is identical in functionality to C=6. Instead, the intent was most likely to have C≥7 add support for individual lane validity (astrb
bit per element lane), while C≥8 adds support for individual lane-based sequence terminations (alast
signal per element lane).