Giving everything a second thought, I think that your idea to name it copy_dir is actually better. As it is implemented this is exactly what it is: it copies the dir like it would have copied the individual files based on copy patterns.
That this can be used for things like assets is a different matter.
Giving everything a second thought, I think that your idea to name it
copy_diris actually better. As it is implemented this is exactly what it is: it copies the dir like it would have copied the individual files based oncopypatterns.That this can be used for things like assets is a different matter.