It starts with USGS and WDPA, but I'm not sure which I'm going to focus on yet. The WDPA is great but perhaps doesn't have the necessary metadata for differentiating federal vs non-federal pub.lands in US. USGS does, but it's an annoying dataset and takes hours to download.
Coverage decreased (-29.8%) to 59.659% when pulling 404f719dd1efe5bf47d01db22030db786fb8c7e4 on start_get into 6541381711c23265a1f860789495b3d0eddc3f4b on master.
This PR implements the
lands
portion ofget.
It starts with USGS and WDPA, but I'm not sure which I'm going to focus on yet. The WDPA is great but perhaps doesn't have the necessary metadata for differentiating federal vs non-federal pub.lands in US. USGS does, but it's an annoying dataset and takes hours to download.