Open JiaZhou-PU opened 1 year ago
FY18
Page 9 Table 4 last row | Source | Year dollar | CPI index factor | Above inflation escalation factor | Total escalation factor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Holcomb 2011) | 2011 | 1.10 | 0 | 1.10 |
Should be | Source | Year dollar | CPI index factor | Above inflation escalation factor | Total escalation factor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Holcomb 2011) | 2011 | 1.10 | 1.0 | 1.10 |
FY18
Page 13 Figure 3 function should show as
y = 3.7012x^{0.4848}
FY18
Page 14 A function for the `Costing relation law for nuclear steam turbine' should have such form:
C_{turbine,eqp}= \frac{362.62}{n}
FY18
Page 17 Table 15
Interior structures | Quantity | labor hours | Labor cost | Material cost | Unit labor cost | Unit material costs | Units | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reactor cavity liner plate | 11000 | SF | 33,000 | 762,300 | 621,291 | 64.73 | 52.76 | $/m2 |
This line should be removed from the table, since the cost is duplicated in Table 17
Others | Quantity | labor hours | Labor cost | Material cost | Unit labor cost | Unit material costs | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reactor cavity liner plate | 11000 | SF | 33,000 | 762,300 | 621,291 | 745.94 | 607.96 | $/m2 |
Item in Table 15 is normalized by Internal surface
2*V_{Internal}/t_{Intern, wall} = 11,775.80039m^2
item in Table 17 is normalized by Reactor cavity area:
11000ft^2 (1021.93344m^2)
It is suggested to keep the item in Table 17.
FY18
Page 23 Eq $C{226,7}=127.2 million \cdot(\frac{MW{th}}{3431})^{0.80}$ Should be
C_{226,7}=127.2 million\cdot (\frac{MW_{th}}{2287})^{0.80}
The scaled base should be 2287 MW rejected thermal power not thermal power 3431 MW.
Page 32 function for $C{226}$ should change to $C{213}$
FY18
Page 32 to 33 function should change to:
C_{235,eqp}=C_{231,fac}\cdot0.089 \\
C_{235,lab}=C_{231,lab}\cdot1.303 \\
C_{235,mat}=C_{231,mat}\cdot0.858
FY18
Page 33 function for Electrical plant equipment should be:
C_{sum(245,246,242,241)}=213.8 million\cdot(\frac{MW_e}{1144})^{0.4}
FY18
The COA is wrong for some accounts, the correct ones are:
Reactor Primary Vessel \ 3.6.4 Expected Cost of the Primary Vessel of the Reference PWR12-BE(220A211)\ 3.6.5 Installation Cost (221.12)
Steam Generators \ 3.8.1 Factory Equipment Cost (220A.223)\ 3.8.2 Installation Cost (222.13)
Reactor Coolant Pumps and Drives \ 3.16.1 Factory Equipment Cost (220A221)
3.21 Lower and Upper Internals(220A2121,220A2122)
3.22 Control Rods (Account 220A2131) and Control Rods’ Drives (Account 220A2132)\ 3.22.1 Cost of Control Rods (Account 220A2131)\ 3.22.2 Cost of Control Rods Drives (Account 220A2132)
4.1.15 Auxiliary cooling system (226.7)
FY18
Page 67 4.1.9 Turbine Room and Heater Bay (Account 213) Function should be:
C_{\bm{213},fac}=1.8 million \cdot(\frac{1000 MW}{3431 MW})^{0.8} \\
C_{\bm{213},lab}=31.8 million \cdot(\frac{1000 MW}{3431 MW})^{0.8} \\
C_{\bm{213},mat}=32.4 million \cdot(\frac{1000 MW}{3431 MW})^{0.8}
and the Table 63 should be | Account | Factory equipment | Site labor | Site material | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
213 | Turbine room and heater bay building | $0.7 million | $12.0 million | $12.2 million | $24.8 million |
Issue Description
Current behavior Some calculations in previous reports do not line up with the expected costs, such as the wrong variables, the wrong value unit convergent, the wrong account number, etc.
Ganda, F., Maronati. G, Taiwo, T. A., and Kim, T. K. Report on Cost Estimation Algorithm for Advanced Nuclear Reactor Concepts. United States: N. p., 2017
Ganda, F., Taiwo, T. A., and Kim, T. K. Report on the Update of Fuel Cycle Cost Algorithms. United States: N. p., 2018
Ganda, F., Hoffman, E., Taiwo, T. A., Kim, T. K., and Hansen, J. Report on the ACCERT Cost Algorithms Tool. United States: N. p., 2019.
Hoffman, E., Abou-Jaoude, A., and Foss, A. Improvement of ACCERT Algorithm - FY20. United States: N. p., 2020.
Expected behavior/code Collect all the corrections needed.
For Issue Closure
This review should occur when the issue is going to be closed.