feature(build) Switches from TravisCI to GitHub actions

[Aniruddha-Shriwant]

Related Issue #379

Changes

• [x] Remove .travis.yml in repo
• [x] Add .github/workflows directory based on those in ./concerto/.github/workflows

Author Checklist

• [x] Ensure you provide a DCO sign-off for your commits using the --signoff option of git commit.
• [ ] Vital features and changes captured in unit and/or integration tests
• [x] Commits messages follow AP format
• [ ] Extend the documentation, if necessary
• [x] Merging to master from fork:branchname

[Aniruddha-Shriwant]

Do we need deploy.yml like this:

name: 'Netlify Preview Deploy'

on:
  pull_request:
    types: ['opened', 'edited', 'synchronize']

jobs:
  deploy:
    name: 'Deploy'
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest

    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v1
      - uses: jsmrcaga/action-netlify-deploy@master
        with:
          NETLIFY_AUTH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.NETLIFY_AUTH_TOKEN }}
          NETLIFY_SITE_ID: ${{ secrets.NETLIFY_SITE_ID }}

Or the Netlify App will do the work of deployment?

[jeromesimeon]

Do we need deploy.yml like this:

name: 'Netlify Preview Deploy'

on:
  pull_request:
    types: ['opened', 'edited', 'synchronize']

jobs:
  deploy:
    name: 'Deploy'
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest

    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v1
      - uses: jsmrcaga/action-netlify-deploy@master
        with:
          NETLIFY_AUTH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.NETLIFY_AUTH_TOKEN }}
          NETLIFY_SITE_ID: ${{ secrets.NETLIFY_SITE_ID }}

Or the Netlify App will do the work of deployment?

I don't think we need any change for Netlify. In theory the Concerto scripts should work as is. Netlify will deploy automatically.

[Aniruddha-Shriwant]

I don't think we need any change for Netlify. In theory the Concerto scripts should work as is. Netlify will deploy automatically.

Okay

[jeromesimeon]

@Aniruddha-Shriwant Can you please change the issue description: this will only be addressing part of #379

[Aniruddha-Shriwant]

@Aniruddha-Shriwant Can you please change the issue description: this will only be addressing part of #379

Is it okay now?