fix: Multiple template handling

[K-Kumar-01]

Signed-off-by: K-Kumar-01 59891164+K-Kumar-01@users.noreply.github.com

Closes #25

Currently, multiple templates with the same identifier can be inserted. We need to ensure that we cannot insert more than one template with the same identifier. The PR aims at that. Now inserting more than one template with the same template won't be possible.

Changes

• Checks if the identifier is present in the `customXML` part.
• If present, `console.info(Template present)` else insert the template.

Flags

• Currently if the template is already present, so there is only a `console.info()`. This may cause users to think that the add-in is not working. We can show a dialog here(I have made some comments on that portion depicting how it can be made).

Screenshots or Video

I tried recording but the debugger was not being shown in the video. Hence, I have shared the screenshots representing the same

Author Checklist

• [x] Ensure you provide a DCO sign-off for your commits using the --signoff option of git commit.
• [ ] Vital features and changes captured in unit and/or integration tests
• [x] Commits messages follow AP format
• [x] Extend the documentation, if necessary
• [x] Merging to master from fork:branchname
• [ ] Manual accessibility test performed
  • [ ] Keyboard-only access, including forms
  • [ ] Contrast at least WCAG Level A
  • [ ] Appropriate labels, alt text, and instructions

[K-Kumar-01]

@algomaster99 @irmerk @DianaLease Requesting your reviews.

EDIT: Also, I had an alternative approach where instead of using the XML queries, we can store the template identifers in a state which are already present in the document and iterate over them. IMO, it will be faster as compared to this one though it needs discussion.

[K-Kumar-01]

P.S. Another good idea would be to integrate pre-commit hooks for the project. :)

@algomaster99 Should I open an issue regarding the same?

[algomaster99]

Should I open an issue regarding the same?

Yes! Go ahead.

[K-Kumar-01]

@algomaster99 I have updated my PR. Currently, the toast functionality is not implemented in this PR. I think we can see this as a separate issue as toast need to be used in many places besides here. What do you think about this?

[K-Kumar-01]

Should I open an issue regarding the same?

Yes! Go ahead.

@algomaster99 I have created an issue for this. Please see if there the description is suitable or not.

[K-Kumar-01]

@algomaster99 I have updated my code to include the toast in the add-in.

Let me know if any change is required

[K-Kumar-01]

@algomaster99 I have replaced the toast package. Let me know if there are any changes required.

[K-Kumar-01]

@algomaster99 Any updates on this one?

[K-Kumar-01]

@algomaster99 I have updated my PR and made the changes. Let me know if there are any more changes required.