Open martinantonmueller opened 1 year ago
relates to #391
Will propose a solution for both issues. The current date handling is managed in this template:
{% if object.start_date_written == object.end_date_written %} # GP: add check here that both dates are not none or catch this case above
<date>{{ object.start_date_written }}</date>
{% elif object.start_date_written and object.end_date_written %}
<date
{% if object.start_start_date %}
from-iso="{{ object.start_start_date|date:'Y-m-d' }}"
{% endif %}
{% if object.end_date %}
to-iso="{{ object.end_date|date:'Y-m-d' }}"
{% endif %}
>{{ object.start_date_written }} – {{ object.end_date_written }}</date>
{% elif object.start_date_written %}
<date
{% if object.start_start_date %}
notBefore-iso="{{ object.start_start_date|date:'Y-m-d' }}"
{% endif %}
{% if object.start_date %}
when-iso="{{ object.start_date|date:'Y-m-d' }}"
{% endif %}
>{{ object.start_date_written }}</date>
{% elif object.end_date_written %}
<date
{% if object.end_date %}
when-iso="{{ object.end_date|date:'Y-m-d' }}"
{% endif %}
{% if object.end_end_date %}
notAfter-iso="{{ object.end_end_date|date:'Y-m-d' }}"
{% endif %}
>{{ object.end_date_written }}</date>
{% else %}
{% endif %}
I think we would need even more checks, for each individual date-section. To unifiy the beaviour, I would propose to return:
@martinantonmueller and @csae8092 - would this be the desired behaviour and if so, what should be the default value for the second case where a to-iso and from-iso is expected but only one of the two is None? Should it be simply "None"
PS: to be clear, in the second case, I suggest, of course, to keep the exisiting date and set the missing date (either from-iso or to-iso to None)
this is an incomplete export:
<date to-iso="1938-09-25">03.12.1918 – 25.09.1938</date>
from-iso
is missingcf. https://pmb.acdh.oeaw.ac.at/apis/entities/tei/institution/36687