Closed natacha-beck closed 1 week ago
This PR replace #1396 one.
It is a way to generalize the usage of alternative identity provider.
It allow the CBRAIN administartor to have a config file oidc.yml with the following information:
oidc.yml
OIDC_name: authorize_uri: "https://.../authorize" token_uri: "https://.../token" logout_uri: "https://...logout" scope: "urn:globus:auth:scope:auth.globus.org:view_identities openid email profile" client_secret: <%= ENV["globus_secret_key"] %> client_id: <%= ENV["globus_client_id"] %> identity_provider: "identity_provider" identity_provider_display_name: "identity_provider_display_name" preferred_username: "preferred_username" link_to: "www.globus.org" link_to_uri: "https://www.globus.org/"
Note Multiple identity provider can co-exist, but the client_id should be unique across all identity provider.
Is this PR still valid? There is another one in #1405 That is better right?
I am pretty sure this is obsolete.
This PR replace #1396 one.
It is a way to generalize the usage of alternative identity provider.
It allow the CBRAIN administartor to have a config file
oidc.yml
with the following information:Note Multiple identity provider can co-exist, but the client_id should be unique across all identity provider.