Closed rbrott closed 5 months ago
then(a) would have the same behavior as afterDisp(0, a)/afterTime(0, a). Perhaps add() is a better name to parallel stopAndAdd().
then(a)
afterDisp(0, a)
afterTime(0, a)
add()
stopAndAdd()
On second thought, I think this is more confusing than the current setup.
then(a)
would have the same behavior asafterDisp(0, a)
/afterTime(0, a)
. Perhapsadd()
is a better name to parallelstopAndAdd()
.