Closed jwbowers closed 5 years ago
I do see your point. in some cases the test stat is the same number as an estimate (as in ate-hat) but other times there no real sense in which it's an estimate of a model parameter, like an f-stat or something.
The main reason to call it "estimate" is to maintain consistency with the broom package -- that way when you call tidy(riobject)
you get a column name that matches the broom workflow.
Not sure how to balance these considerations....
Good point. Not a big deal. Just mostly an FYI.
Right now
summary(riobject)
returns something likeGiven the flexibility of ri2, since this is the value of the observed test statistic and is not necessarily a good estimate of any particular target, wouldn't it be better to label this as something like "observed test statistic"?