Open codygman opened 7 years ago
The Row
definition isn't using unique type names for the columns, so the recent patch to look up type names before defining them won't prevent this. I like this way of fixing the inference, though, so it's worth taking a look to see if we can do the name lookups before the Row
definition and swap in the existing definition if found. Could be tricky.
Code
expected type
actual type after attempting (but probably failing to ensure) column types aren't created if existing