Open i2000s opened 10 years ago
Well, hbar=1 is as realistic as any other choice of units :-) We shouldn't use hbar in SI units, but maybe provide an option to change the value (although I have to say that I can't imagine anyone wants to use something else than hbar=1 in the calculations).
Just to remind to document, at some stage, where the hbar is not shown in your code is because of using hbar=1.
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 1:13 PM, acroy notifications@github.com wrote:
Well, hbar=1 is as realistic as any other choice of units :-) We shouldn't use hbar in SI units, but maybe provide an option to change the value (although I have to say that I can't imagine anyone wants to use something else than hbar=1 in the calculations).
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/acroy/QuDOS.jl/issues/4#issuecomment-52096032.
I have noticed that you have implicitly set _hbar = 1_. Could it be more realistic to explicitly use the usual hbar in all computing?