Open WilcoFiers opened 8 months ago
Decision:
add an Accessibility Support note to every rule using "Accessibility tree" as input aspect, stating that "aria-busy
exists but isn't widely supported (JAWS only, currently, it seems), so the rule ignores it".
This comes from an ARIA review
We currently only have one rule that has an exception for aria-busy. I think for that rule it is a reasonable thing to have. I'm less sure about other rules, it seems unlikely that aria-busy is going to resolve issues such as invalid roles, or missing text alternatives. Even if not, should rules have an assumption that content is loaded?