search

acteng / schema

Data schema and associated test data, code, ideas
MIT License
2 stars 0 forks source link

Start a schema based on ATF4 guidance #34

Closed dabreegster closed 1 year ago

dabreegster commented 1 year ago

31

Note the schema isn't written correctly yet; the editor shows an error Value must validate against exactly one of the provided schemas. It currently validates against 4 of the schemas.. I think it's because the complexity field is used in all of the enum cases, so the schema can't understand which case we're in. Not worried about figuring out the right way to encode this yet; this is all just illustrative anyway.

Also, I only added a few categories from the page. The details in each one are not terribly interesting... instead of making people pick complexity, we should ask more specific questions and auto-calculate complexity from it

Robinlovelace commented 1 year ago

Will check locally now...

Robinlovelace commented 1 year ago

Looking good.

image

Robinlovelace commented 1 year ago

Seems to only be scheme level options and complexity + n. junctions, right?

Robinlovelace commented 1 year ago

In any case, good iteration and something we can build on.

dabreegster commented 1 year ago

Seems to only be scheme level options and complexity + n. junctions, right?

No, the schema describes one single intervention. Each is one of 4 cases, with different details based on the table in the guidance doc. Most of those details are just a complexity field.

Robinlovelace commented 1 year ago

I think the key thing is a taxonomy that includes the types of intervention:

image

Those can be within out existing top level classification of area/route/crossing interventions I think.

dabreegster commented 1 year ago

Those can be within out existing top level classification of area/route/crossing interventions I think.

Notice this JSON schema doesn't mention area/route/crossing/other. I'm trying to follow exactly the doc's system in this option.

Robinlovelace commented 1 year ago

Those can be within out existing top level classification of area/route/crossing interventions I think.

Notice this JSON schema doesn't mention area/route/crossing/other. I'm trying to follow exactly the doc's system in this option.

That's reasonable. Good to be faithful to what's in the guidance for reference.