sc-57182/fix-date-masking

[johnrb2]

Description of the change

fix logic for masking dates

Type of change

• [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
• [ ] New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality)
• [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• [ ] Configuration change
• [ ] Technical Debt
• [ ] Documentation

Related tickets

https://app.shortcut.com/active-prospect/story/57182/fix-date-masking

Checklists

Development and Testing

• [x] Lint rules pass locally.
• [x] The code changed/added as part of this pull request has been covered with tests, or this PR does not alter production code.
• [x] All tests related to the changed code pass in development, or tests are not applicable.

Code Review

• [x] This pull request has a descriptive title and information useful to a reviewer. There may be a screenshot or screencast attached.
• [x] At least two engineers have been added as "Reviewers" on the pull request.
• [ ] Changes have been reviewed by at least two other engineers who did not write the code.
• [x] This branch has been rebased off master to be current.

Tracking

• [x] Issue from Shortcut/Jira has a link to this pull request.
• [x] This PR has a link to the issue in Shortcut.

QA

• [ ] This branch has been deployed to staging and tested.

[shortcut-integration[bot]]

This pull request has been linked to Shortcut Story #57182: fix date masking.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and no project coverage change.

Comparison is base (c9f5e29) 97.43% compared to head (f526291) 97.43%.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #159 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 97.43% 97.43% ======================================= Files 37 37 Lines 701 702 +1 ======================================= + Hits 683 684 +1 Misses 18 18 ``` | [Impacted Files](https://app.codecov.io/gh/activeprospect/leadconduit-types/pull/159?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=activeprospect) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [lib/aggregations/date.js](https://app.codecov.io/gh/activeprospect/leadconduit-types/pull/159?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=activeprospect#diff-bGliL2FnZ3JlZ2F0aW9ucy9kYXRlLmpz) | `100.00% <100.00%> (ø)` | | | [lib/index.js](https://app.codecov.io/gh/activeprospect/leadconduit-types/pull/159?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=activeprospect#diff-bGliL2luZGV4Lmpz) | `87.23% <100.00%> (ø)` | | | [lib/types/date.js](https://app.codecov.io/gh/activeprospect/leadconduit-types/pull/159?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=activeprospect#diff-bGliL3R5cGVzL2RhdGUuanM=) | `96.15% <100.00%> (+0.32%)` | :arrow_up: |

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.