Closed ioExpander closed 1 year ago
I have been investigating what you say about the xbar app and it seems interesting, but is the GUI that is installed with the code that you share us functional with the Battery CLI?
Or is it just to see the app icon on the bar?
Thanks for a great contribution.
Regards
Pablo
I have been investigating what you say about the xbar app and it seems interesting, but is the GUI that is installed with the code that you share us functional with the Battery CLI?
Or is it just to see the app icon on the bar?
Thanks for a great contribution.
Regards
Pablo
I tried installing xbar since it seemed like a great app, but strangely nothing worked, from the Cardano price monitor to the CPU temperature monitor.
I imagine it may be a compatibility issue with the MB Pro M1, I even tried with Battery installed but not running the GUI and your code didn't work for me either. Something you're not seeing? that you can guide me?
Thank you
Regards
Hi @Zeroscl. Thank you for showing interest. This issue is more about creating a brew package for the battery CLI rather than discussing xbar. I just wanted to provide some context. I've added a screenshot and some tips here to help you. Can we continue that conversation on the gist page so that we keep the focus on creating a brew package for this issue ? I'm happy to help over there. Using xbar is not as simple as click-install-run. You sometimes need to download additionnal dependencies, reading the code and comments of the plugin is often recommended.
@ioExpander you're purely asking for a brew package of the CLI?
yes 👍
For me the current CLI is plenty so I won't make it, but feel free to make a cask, I'm not against in principle.
@actuallymentor I have the same idea about Electron, but I'm thinking about the best solution.
I think the implementation of @ioExpander using xbar or swiftbar is specific to him.
Another solution was fork your repo and create a Swift/SwiftUI version of the cask, but I thought was missing the same purpose/scope of a battery-cli
cask. (I used to run bclm for Intel Macs that is written in Swift but has only cli version).
I can create a PR to homebrew-cask
for a new battery-cli
and maybe you can replace in the README the method to install only cli.
Let me know if you are fine with this or you prefer something different.
Another question @actuallymentor: are there some design motivation for use /usr/local/bin
as installation path instead of homebrew default /opt/homebrew
on Apple Silicon macs?
@kevinm6 the tool was designed before I added it to brew, I was just looking for a logical place for binaries and called which
on something to see where some common tools were.
I'm more a full stack web/crypto oriented dev, and finding the answer to "what is the right place for binary files" just brought up some stack overflow feuds.
If you have a suggestion to change it, I'm all ears. Does the brew path always exist on macbooks by default?
When you install Homebrew, as the docs says, the
brew —-prefix
is created and added to env PATH, based on the architecture of the pc (/usr/local
on Intel Macs,/opt/homebrew
on Apple Silicon Macs) and after that brew create a symlink of the binary (casks and formulae) to the relative path for binaries. This design from brew is used to avoid usesudo
if is not really required.
Thanks for the reply, @actuallymentor.
Since I was trying to make a battery-cli
only version I dive deeper in the code and probably cli-only version can diff more than I was thinking.
For the battery
cask I think your choice is fine, since the output is a Battery.app
, that installed via brew in /Applications/Battery.app
and symlinked to /opt/homebrew/Caskroom
, but some problems/conflicts could happens with the CLI version from your README if both are installed.
So was a cli-only version added to Homebrew?
So was a cli-only version added to Homebrew?
In part. I've created one with some refactor, but due to Homebrew docs I've avoided to pull a request to add an only-cli version of a cask.
You can install it but it's a Homebrew tap, so it requires an extra step that's reported in the README.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. As I find Electron apps to be a little bloated, I'm trying to avoid using the battery GUI. I'm currently using the CLI with a quick shell script plugin build for the xbar app Unfortunately
brew install battery
installs both the CLI and the GUI.Describe the solution you'd like Having a separate package to install the CLI standalone eg :
brew instal battery-cli
Other ideas considered Build a GUI using Tauri - but I'm trying to KISS. The xbar plugin only takes 15 lines of bash script
Additional context Plugin Code Available Here