Open patrickbr opened 7 months ago
The intermediate geometry objects to which the geo:asWKT predicates are attached should be in the NAMESPACE__OSM2RDF_GEOM namespace (osm2rdfgeom: in the generated .ttl). For ways, these are in the NAMESPACE__OSM2RDF namespace (osm2rdf: in the generated .ttl). See https://github.com/ad-freiburg/osm2rdf/blob/80daa32e066ba5091a36ed078d37228662cbe7e7/src/osm/FactHandler.cpp#L285
geo:asWKT
NAMESPACE__OSM2RDF_GEOM
osm2rdfgeom:
.ttl
NAMESPACE__OSM2RDF
osm2rdf:
I might be wrong, but shouldn't https://github.com/ad-freiburg/osm2rdf/blob/80daa32e066ba5091a36ed078d37228662cbe7e7/src/osm/FactHandler.cpp#L245C13-L245C36 also be in NAMESPACE__OSM2RDF_GEOM?
Does the GeoSPARQL standard say anything about how these intermediate nodes should be called?
Are blank nodes an option?
The intermediate geometry objects to which the
geo:asWKT
predicates are attached should be in theNAMESPACE__OSM2RDF_GEOM
namespace (osm2rdfgeom:
in the generated.ttl
). For ways, these are in theNAMESPACE__OSM2RDF
namespace (osm2rdf:
in the generated.ttl
). See https://github.com/ad-freiburg/osm2rdf/blob/80daa32e066ba5091a36ed078d37228662cbe7e7/src/osm/FactHandler.cpp#L285I might be wrong, but shouldn't https://github.com/ad-freiburg/osm2rdf/blob/80daa32e066ba5091a36ed078d37228662cbe7e7/src/osm/FactHandler.cpp#L245C13-L245C36 also be in
NAMESPACE__OSM2RDF_GEOM
?