Closed hannahbast closed 11 months ago
Hi Hannah, ENCODE_FOR_URI
sounds interesting and I´d like to give it a try! @joka921also suggested the implementation of the hash functions (https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#func-hash) as a next step. Do you have any preference what I should prioritize?
Hi, Definitely ENCODE_FOR_URI
which is much more relevant than the hashing functions.
Okay! :) I'll start working on it next week! Thank you both!
@greenBene and cc @joka921 I think it would be a great continuation of your #1116 to implement the
ENCODE_FOR_URI
. Boost now has a URL class (it didn't have for the longest time), which (I think) provides this functionality. We should use the occasion to check whether theUrlParser
in https://github.com/ad-freiburg/qlever/tree/master/src/util/http shouldn't be replaced by functionality from Boost.