Add UV Index, use adafruit_register

[tekktrik]

I don't have the hardware but did by best to resolve #1 by adding the UV index functionaliy. Some other changes happened along the way:

• _i2c is now i2c_device, because that's what adafruit_register expects
• Refactored the ALS to use adafruit_register while I was in there, as well as a few other things, but some things made more sense not to based on the way RAM+offset writes happen as well

[caternuson]

Is using register necessary? It's a simple sensor and bringing in register will make it potentially not usable on small boards.

[tekktrik]

Probably not necessary, I really just noticed that some of the functionality here could be covered by using it. I think that was just my understanding of the design guide, but definitely understand the argument for avoiding it. This shouldn't be too difficult to refactor out if we go that route.

[caternuson]

Added @adafruit/circuitpythonlibrarians as reviewers so others can comments.

[tekktrik]

Oh never mind, the design guide only specifies adafruit_bus_device, whoops! I can refactor it out if you think that's the best move.

[caternuson]

My two cents is to leave it out for now. I only consider using the register lib for a device if there are a lot of registers broken up into various smaller bits that control a guzillion internal settings. The SI1145 only has a few, like IRQ_ENABLE and IRQ_STATUS.

But the counter argument is the abstracting out of all the bit shifting / masking foo that the register lib provides for the sake of code safety.

[tekktrik]

I'm out during the next meeting, but maybe this worth bringing up on the Monday meeting? I can add it and just listen to the meeting after the fact.