Closed bartwe closed 2 years ago
First, I would like to thank you for the enhancement efforts.
For details:
make check
failure too? I can take a look later, but it takes time.unsigned
good enough? (Even this is arguably unnecessary, as the array involved is statically bounded, and the size should be fine. But the change is fine apart from the potential performance loss on 64-bit systems.)ends_with
change might affect performancelb_process_next_char
change is API-breaking: is it really worthwhile?It might also be a good idea that you break these PRs so that I can accept them separately.
Closing and splitting into separate prs
Fix issues with string length ranges being put into int and unsigned instead of kept in size_t. Fix issue with int typed functions returning char typed values which are assigned to char typed results. Update data to unicode 14.0.0