Closed josephwb closed 8 years ago
Is there any chance that you are trying to use it in a 32bit machine? (It sounds like a stupid question, but just in case). Otherwise, which linux distribution are you using? I have just tried it in Mint and Red Hat and it worked properly in both of them.
Thank you very much for your interest in SimPhy and for reporting the problem.
Diego M.
P.S. I am glad you were able to compile it from scratch!
Definitely 64bit. Debian.
Hey, just a note a colleague tried this on Ubuntu the other day with the same result.
Thanks for the warning, @josephwb! I can reproduce your error on Debian sid.
It seems that it's the same problem as reported here: http://askubuntu.com/questions/60238/running-a-64bit-executable-on-a-64-ubuntu-lucid/87189
That is, the pre-compiled loader is ld-lsb, while in the system I have ld-linux.
Quick and dirty solution:
sudo ln -s /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 /lib64/ld-lsb-x86-64.so.3
Or, in theory, installing the package lsb in Ubuntu (I haven't tried.)
Longer version: If I compare the ldd output from both I obtain (removing the uninteresting part of the output):
~/Downloads/SimPhy_1.0.1/bin] ldd simphy_static
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0000558943930000)
~/Downloads/SimPhy_1.0.1/bin] ldd simphy_lnx64
/lib64/ld-lsb-x86-64.so.3 => /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x000055dfd598f000)
And if we see the file type (command "file"):
simphy_static: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, interpreter /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2, for GNU/Linux 2.6.32, BuildID[sha1]=5cddef1f2c7c1b8dce09db7c17de4ea4133f620b, not stripped
simphy_lnx64: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, interpreter /lib64/ld-lsb-x86-64.so.3, for GNU/Linux 2.6.24, BuildID[sha1]=3bd8a4fc664f2ac922f839149662575962499393, not stripped
For Debian the lsb packages didn't help at all, but I might be missing something...
I'm afraid I have no solution to offer, just pointing out the problem. :bowtie:
How does a binary compiled on Debian fare on Red Hat? Is there the reciprocal problem? I shared the binary I compiled on Debian with my colleague who works with Ubuntu, and it works for him.
As I mentioned above, this is moot for me since compilation was so straightforward (despite the README being very foreboding).
Thank you very much for letting us know again, Joseph.
We have decided to distribute binaries compiled with gcc instead of lsbcc. Thus, we avoid the usage of the ld-lsb loader and stick to the ld-linux. This should solve the problem. We will also provide an alternative version, compliant with the Linux Standard Base as before.
Cool. Ping me if you'd like me to test things.
Thank you very much. I appreciate your offer :). I've tried it in my Debian VM and it works properly, but if you could just try to download and execute the last precompiled version (release 1.0.2) to confirm that it works now it would be nice. If it does I'll close the issue.
Works for me.
Thank you very much.
I downloaded the latest version and made the binary executable:
However, when I try to run it, I get the following error:
I have never seen this error before, so I am not sure what the problem is.
This is a bit moot since I was able to compile myself easily, but I thought I would pass this along. :bowtie: