adamchainz / blacken-docs

Run `black` on python code blocks in documentation files
MIT License
642 stars 42 forks source link

Formatting isn't applied across the whole file #302

Open deepyaman opened 11 months ago

deepyaman commented 11 months ago

Python Version

3.10.11

Package Version

1.16.0

Description

When I format https://github.com/deepyaman/ibis/blob/build/blacken-docs-issue/ibis/expr/operations/udf.py using blacken-docs, only one code block seems to be getting parsed:

diff --git a/ibis/expr/operations/udf.py b/ibis/expr/operations/udf.py
index 09f6e41ee..bac4033ae 100644
--- a/ibis/expr/operations/udf.py
+++ b/ibis/expr/operations/udf.py
@@ -191,7 +191,8 @@ class scalar(_UDF):
         >>> import ibis
         >>> @ibis.udf.scalar.builtin
         ... def hamming(a: str, b: str) -> int:
-        ...     '''Compute the Hamming distance between two strings.'''
+        ...     """Compute the Hamming distance between two strings."""
+        ...
         >>> expr = hamming("duck", "luck")
         >>> con = ibis.connect("duckdb://")
         >>> con.execute(expr)

I would expect all of the remaining code blocks to also get formatted (similar issues with missing blank line and docstring quoting).

adamchainz commented 11 months ago

Yeah, I can't really spot why the final block isn't being picked up. Could you minimize the file down to the smallest failing example? That would probably reveal the problem.

deepyaman commented 11 months ago

Yeah, I can't really spot why the final block isn't being picked up. Could you minimize the file down to the smallest failing example? That would probably reveal the problem.

@adamchainz First off, thanks for getting back to me so quickly, and sorry for taking so long to reply! Kept slipping my mind.

Second, it looks like the issue is actually more significant. Here's a fairly minimal file, foo.py:

import operator

def accumulate(iterable, func=operator.add, *, initial=None):
    """Returns running totals.

    ```pycon
    >>> def mul(a, b):
    ...     '''Return ``a * b``, for *a* and *b* numbers.'''
    ...     return a * b
    ...
    >>> list(accumulate([1, 2, 3, 4, 5], mul))
    [1, 2, 6, 24, 120]
"""
it = iter(iterable)
total = initial
if initial is None:
    try:
        total = next(it)
    except StopIteration:
        return
yield total
for element in it:
    total = func(total, element)
    yield total

def accumulate2(iterable, func=operator.add, *, initial=None): """Returns running totals.

```pycon
>>> def mul(a, b):
...     '''Return ``a * b``, for *a* and *b* numbers.'''
...     return a * b
...
>>> list(accumulate([1, 2, 3, 4, 5], mul))
[1, 2, 6, 24, 120]

```
"""
return accumulate(iterable, func, initial=initial)

(It works; `python -m doctest -v foo.py` will tell you "Test passed.")

Once again, `blacken-docs foo.py` only formats the first docstring:

```diff
diff --git a/foo.py b/foo.py
index 4434688d7..2bf750329 100644
--- a/foo.py
+++ b/foo.py
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ def accumulate(iterable, func=operator.add, *, initial=None):

     ```pycon
     >>> def mul(a, b):
-    ...     '''Return ``a * b``, for *a* and *b* numbers.'''
+    ...     """Return ``a * b``, for *a* and *b* numbers."""
     ...     return a * b
     ...
     >>> list(accumulate([1, 2, 3, 4, 5], mul))

Without having debugged it, or having bothered to look into how blacken-docs works, my guess is (correct me if I'm wrong) that it iterates over docstrings, and it doesn't do anything past the first docstring because the first change results in invalid code. The above change actually shouldn't be applied, because the leading """ in mul closes the accumulate docstring.

adamchainz commented 3 months ago

I think I just fixed the “rest of the file” bug in #347.

But the docstring is still being left in a broken state, and that isn't something we can easily prevent. The snippet passed to Black has no context that it's in a docstring, and I don't fancy trying to fix it up after the fact. Perhaps we should have a guard for ''' - I will give that a try.