This line has a check that throws an error if any child within children is not of StepActions type OR the child is not of StepContent type.
It would make more sense to me if this check only threw an error if any of the children were not of StepActions type AND that that child was also not of StepContent type. Did you mean to write this instead?
if ((child.type !== StepActions) && (child.type !== StepContent)) {
This line has a check that throws an error if any child within children is not of
StepActionstype OR the child is not ofStepContenttype.It would make more sense to me if this check only threw an error if any of the children were not of
StepActionstype AND that that child was also not ofStepContenttype. Did you mean to write this instead?