Closed gbdias closed 3 years ago
Thanks for being an early adopter. Unfortunately that means you get to help get the bugs out as it hasn't been tested with NGMLR .bams at all. Do your reads have quality scores present in the .bam file? If it's a public dataset you can point me at I'd be happy to try it out. Also, a word of caution about PacBio + TLDR: TLDR requires at least one read to have the fully embedded TE sequence. TLDR + CCS/HiFi reads show reduced sensitivity for long TE insertions as a result. Performance with Non-CCS/HiFi PacBio reads (i.e. subreads) is not great. If you haven't had a look at PALMER as well that might be a better fit: https://github.com/mills-lab/PALMER
Hi @adamewing,
OK, thanks. This hasn't been tested with CLR reads no no advice either way yet. TLDR does expect quality scores at present, might be possible to get around if it ends up being a frequent use case.
.bams w/o quality score suppported in 9067882