Closed dancgray closed 4 years ago
Having looked at a few statements from questions types, I would agree that using the body element would be a lot more useful, and provide a lot more flexibility when viewing the data on an LRS.
In our course setup we don't always use the instruction and where we have it is pretty meaningless information as it is used for instruction only.
I don't know if anyone else has ever used the instruction text to provide anything of additional value that I'm not considering but i would be all for dropping the instruction and taking the body element of questions.
Thanks @kevindoherty30, agreed. The body text will likely be HTML, do you think this should be encoded or escaped before sending as a statement?
Hi @dancgray, apologies for the late reply. I think this should definitely be escaped.
Closing as this is in place for v0.8. Thanks for testing @dancgray.
For question statements the object definition description uses the question instruction text value here.
For most use cases the question text and description is likely to be in the body element.
Would it be more useful to use the body element?