In the Assessment extension, it's possible to give a user-friendly ID in lieu of the article _id value. The problem is that this is not passed in the xAPI passed or failed statement. As such, it's currently very difficult to parse such xAPI statements to extract the statement for a specific assessment.
Ideally the Assessment ID would be passed as an extension on the xAPI statement. In addition we could probably also add Attempt ID as defined in the TinCan registry.
oliverfoster
commented
1 year ago
In the Assessment extension, it's possible to give a user-friendly ID in lieu of the article
_idvalue. The problem is that this is not passed in the xAPIpassedorfailedstatement. As such, it's currently very difficult to parse such xAPI statements to extract the statement for a specific assessment.Ideally the Assessment ID would be passed as an
extensionon the xAPI statement. In addition we could probably also add Attempt ID as defined in the TinCan registry.