Closed romainfrancois closed 2 years ago
We're about to release dplyr 1.0.8 and as part of running our rev dep tests, we've identified that this package may have a problem:
> checking tests ... ERROR See below... ── Test failures ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── testthat ──── > Sys.setenv("R_TESTS" = "") # see https://github.com/hadley/testthat/issues/86 > library(testthat) > library(checkmate) > library(dplyr) Attaching package: 'dplyr' The following object is masked from 'package:testthat': matches The following objects are masked from 'package:stats': filter, lag The following objects are masked from 'package:base': intersect, setdiff, setequal, union > library(purrr) Attaching package: 'purrr' The following object is masked from 'package:testthat': is_null > library(tidyr) Attaching package: 'tidyr' The following object is masked from 'package:testthat': matches > # library(pammtools) > > test_check("pammtools") Loading required package: pammtools Attaching package: 'pammtools' The following object is masked from 'package:stats': filter ══ Failed tests ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ ── Error (test-add-functions.R:268:3): CIF works ─────────────────────────────── Error in `apply(Reduce("+", hazards), 2, function(z) exp(-cumsum(z * newdata[["intlen"]])))`: dim(X) must have a positive length Backtrace: ▆ 1. ├─... %>% add_cif(pam) at test-add-functions.R:268:2 2. ├─pammtools::add_cif(., pam) 3. └─pammtools:::add_cif.default(., pam) 4. └─purrr::map_dfr(...) 5. └─purrr::map(.x, .f, ...) 6. └─pammtools .f(.x[[i]], ...) 7. ├─pammtools:::get_cif(...) 8. └─pammtools:::get_cif.default(...) 9. └─base::apply(...) [ FAIL 1 | WARN 0 | SKIP 0 | PASS 359 ] Error: Test failures Execution halted 1 error x | 0 warnings ✓ | 0 notes ✓
I have not been able to figure out what the problem is, or identify if this is dplyr related or caused by something else.
dplyr
We're about to release dplyr 1.0.8 and as part of running our rev dep tests, we've identified that this package may have a problem:
I have not been able to figure out what the problem is, or identify if this is
dplyr
related or caused by something else.