Support -swf-lib argument in .hxml build

[GoogleCodeExporter]

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Add a swf library file to your project
2. Add a -swf-lib line to your .haxml build file
3. Try to compile your project

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
The project should include your .swf library

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
The nightly version. Ubuntu 10.10 + Galileo

I changed the haxe executable to a .sh file that would simply write the 
arguments to a text file.

This is the output:
haxe.sh -main Main -D network-sandbox -cp src -cp <project path>/src -debug 
-swf9 main.swf

It is missing the -swc-lib that I addd to the buid.hxml.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by nat...@transloc-inc.com on 28 Dec 2010 at 1:45

[GoogleCodeExporter]

My build.hxml:
-cp src
-debug
-main Main
-swf9 main.swf
-swf-version 9
-D network-sandbox
-swf-lib asset_lib.swf

Original comment by nat...@transloc-inc.com on 28 Dec 2010 at 1:46

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Thank you for using eclihx! Could you give more precise information about the 
version where you've reproduced this bug? What is the date of your nightly 
version? It looks like it was fixed at December, 18 (Commit: Fix bug with 
ignoring swf-lib after parsing). Also with the commit "Run directly with the 
hxml file. Should be more predictable and stable for future haxe releases." 
from the same date such problems should go away. I have also added your hxml 
file as functional test.

So resolution for now is "Fixed in trunk", if you won't reopen it.

Original comment by goodwi...@gmail.com on 29 Dec 2010 at 5:23

• Changed state: Fixed

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Nevermind. I just looked and it appears that the plugins that I have came 
directly from subversion. I downloaded them December 27th.

Original comment by nat...@transloc-inc.com on 29 Dec 2010 at 8:10

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I pulled from http://eclihx.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/. Is the subversion 
repository no longer maintained? Should I use the hg repository instead?

Original comment by nat...@transloc-inc.com on 29 Dec 2010 at 8:15

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Yes, I've moved project to hg, because it looks like it's more suitable for 
open source and for single commits instead sending diffs. There was also a 
desire to try distributed source safe systems in real project as one of the 
reasons. 
SVN is available but doesn't get new updates any more.

Original comment by goodwi...@gmail.com on 30 Dec 2010 at 7:58