Closed champignoom closed 2 years ago
Never mind, I missed \setupvimtyping[vimcommand=nvim]
.
But still, MWE could improve the credibility of the instructions, and it would be nice to have something like "shell error: command not found: vim".
The vim
module (or the filter
module in general) doesn't check for installed programs. I am not sure how to check that.
The shell will give an error, but that is easy to miss. For example, in zsh, I see:
close source > level 2, order 7, name 't-vim.tex'
fonts > preloading latin modern fonts (second stage)
fonts > 'fallback modern-designsize rm 12pt' is loaded
t-filter > cached output file 'test-temp-C-0.vimout' missing. Rerunning filter
sh: line 1: bvim: command not found
t-filter > file 'test-temp-C-0.vimout' cannot be found
t-filter > current filter : C
t-filter > base file : test-temp-C-0
t-filter > input file : test-temp-C-0.tmp
t-filter > output file : test-temp-C-0.vimout
backend > xmp > using file '/opt/luametatex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/mkiv/lpdf-pdx.xml'
pages > flushing realpage 1, userpage 1, subpage 1
Note the line starting with sh:
It says bvim: command not found
(bvim
, because I changed the program name to use a program name not on my system).
sh: ... vim: command not found
is right there indeed.
So this is more of a problem of context logging than of t-filter. Might be off-topic here, but is there/could there be a separation of logging levels (like error>warning>info>debugging) for context?
The concatenation of the scattered code in vim-README does not form a valid showcase. In particular, with
shell_escape = t
set in textmf.cnf, the following code produces[[output file missing
on my machine:It would be nice to have a MWE for t-vim. Besides,
things are hardly useful without explanations of how they could be useful.