I'm suggesting that the following is what's required of the LRS, mainly because this is what Watershed does today and it seems reasonable to me.
For agents the name property is omitted
For verbs the display property is omitted
For activities the definition property is omitted.
The point of contention is whether or not the LRS MUST omit the objectType property when the actor contains an agent (not a group). I'd argue that the LRS SHOULD NOT but MAY.
See https://github.com/adlnet/grail-issue-tracker/issues/61#issuecomment-272418796
I'm suggesting that the following is what's required of the LRS, mainly because this is what Watershed does today and it seems reasonable to me.
The point of contention is whether or not the LRS MUST omit the objectType property when the actor contains an agent (not a group). I'd argue that the LRS SHOULD NOT but MAY.