Open christian-bromann opened 6 years ago
What is of course difficult about this is that I have no idea how people are using this and which API's need to continue being supported for historical reasons. I think the proposal to do a rebuild on top of the webdriver core project to re-implement these interfaces makes sense. Maybe start with promises as a major breaking release and then add the other stuff back in if people ask for it.
I also like the idea that WD functionality that people like could inform work for webdriverio and eventually just become a small wrapper, so that work doesn't need to be done in multiple projects everytime something changes.
I agree with @admc. My thought for a next major rev would be:
i think if we do all that we'll have something that isn't busted and can be used immediately by many users or easily migrated to by other users.
Let's make a plan on how we can port core logic from the
webdriver
into WD. Given the current state I feel uncomfortable just adding it as another dependency and just stuck it into the code base. It seems to be that a rewrite that would retain the WD API is the best way forward. Therefor let's discuss what we can keep as functionality and API interface and what we should drop.The following I consider outdated and should be dropped:
I feel like if we want to modernise this everyone needs to rewrite his tests anyway if we would drop promises. I would rather spend time on adopting all the nice things of WD into WebdriverIO.
What do you guys think? @admc @jlipps