It took me a while to find out that this is about the globalAssetId of the Asset Administration Shell. Would it be possible to clarify it in the UI?
Since the globalAssetId is optional, would it make sense to adjust the feedback to something soft like "no globalAssetID provided" or something along the lines?
Since - when creating an admin shell from an Aspect Model - we are only on model level, we don't have any "instance data", no concrete twin. Am I right that it is the recommendation is indeed to keep the globalAssetID empty? If not, what is your recommendation with respect to naming scheme of globalAssetID?
Dear IDTA team, dear AAS Package Explorer maintainers,
We (the Eclipse Semantic Modeling Framework maintainer) came across the following:
When creating an Admin Shell (in xml format) with Submodel from an Aspect Model using the SAMM CLI ( see https://eclipse-esmf.github.io/esmf-developer-guide/tooling-guide/samm-cli.html#samm-cli-getting-started ), I am getting an "ID missing!":
Three questions about this:
Thanks for your insights and help!