Closed griemens closed 5 months ago
@griemens is there some particular event, like publication or something else making you re-checking this?
No particular event. Just evaluating in what cases AAS is the preferred choice compared to others like DTDL, iTwinJS schemas, AML. So far I could not find a good description of the motivation for this recommendation, so wondering if is still correct or new insights emerged last 2 years. Note: If external reference is still not recommended it would probably also mean that use cases that requires this, should probably not use AAS.
Thank you for the clarification.
Hi @griemens,
i think this is a difference, between "possible" and "recommended":
So its not about using external references or not in general, it is about what to point to, i.e., a 'particular' submodel id or a 'resolvable' asset id.
BR
At official FAQs. It states for refencing external sub models
"2. Direct references to external AAS or Submodels using ReferenceElements or RelationshipElements. We currently do not recommend this method in case of lacking generalizability and creation of tight couplings between AAS (by taking over the “resolution” part).)" https://github.com/admin-shell-io/questions-and-answers#id42 https://admin-shell-io.github.io/questions-and-answers/#id42
Is this today still not recommended ?
Thank you for the insight.