Consider, how to document SubmodelElementLists in the class tables. Problem: If the lists contains SubmodelElementCollections but these SMC do not have a shortId, the shortId is missing for a class table for that indexed SMC's
Consider units in the class table?
Cardinality is e.g., [0..1] in class tables and "ZeroToOne" as Qualifier value -> Harmonize?
Class table has the row "Explanation:" - Why not harmonize with metamodel to "description" ?
sometimes there is no description (metamodel) but the definition (IEC 61360) available -> Define a description/definition@en ?
It is defined to use, e.g., valueType [String] not [xs:String] -> why not harmonize 1:1 with the metamodel ValueTypes?
With introduction of SubmodelElementListe the cardinality of [..toMany] is not need anymore?! To be reflected in the Guideline?
Consider, how to document SubmodelElementLists in the class tables. Problem: If the lists contains SubmodelElementCollections but these SMC do not have a shortId, the shortId is missing for a class table for that indexed SMC's
Consider units in the class table?
Cardinality is e.g., [0..1] in class tables and "ZeroToOne" as Qualifier value -> Harmonize?
Class table has the row "Explanation:" - Why not harmonize with metamodel to "description" ?
sometimes there is no description (metamodel) but the definition (IEC 61360) available -> Define a description/definition@en ?
It is defined to use, e.g., valueType [String] not [xs:String] -> why not harmonize 1:1 with the metamodel ValueTypes?
With introduction of SubmodelElementListe the cardinality of [..toMany] is not need anymore?! To be reflected in the Guideline?